WEDNESDAY · 14 OCT 2026 · 10:23 UTCRSSMY BRIEFINGS
MODELS14 OCT 2026 · 09:08 UTC

LiquidAI Releases LFM2.5-24B-A2B for Fast On-Device Agents

LiquidAI released LFM2.5-24B-A2B on October 13, 2026, a 24-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model activating only 2 billion parameters per token. It enables fast on-device reasoning agents with a 131K context window, outperforming larger rivals on five of eight agentic benchmarks-including triple the AutomationBench score-while decoding at 184 tokens per second on an Apple M5 Max. Day-one support for llama.cpp, MLX, vLLM, SGLang, and ONNX allows immediate deployment via OpenAI-comp

MODELS DESK
LiquidAI Releases LFM2.5-24B-A2B for Fast On-Device Agents
LiquidAI released LFM2.5-24B-A2B on October 13, 2026, a 24-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model activating only 2 billion pa…
LiquidAI Releases LFM2.5-24B-A2B for Fast On-Device Agents

Short answer: LiquidAI released LFM2.5-24B-A2B on October 13, 2026, a 24-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model activating only 2 billion parameters per token. It enables fast on-device reasoning agents with a 131K context window, outperforming larger rivals on five of eight agentic benchmarks-including triple the AutomationBench score-while decoding at 184 tokens per second on an Apple M5 Max. Day-one support for llama.cpp, MLX, vLLM, SGLang, and ONNX allows immediate deployment via OpenAI-compatible backends.

LiquidAI LFM2.5-24B-A2B release

LiquidAI just dropped LFM2.5-24B-A2B, a 24-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model that only wakes up 2 billion parameters per token. That’s the headline: you can actually run serious reasoning agents on local hardware now. It landed on Hugging Face October 13, 2026, complete with benchmarks and integration guides for the usual agent frameworks. Since each reasoning step touches a tiny slice of the total weights, the model chews through long chains of thought and tool-calling loops without melting your consumer CPU or GPU.

LFM2.5-24B-A2B architecture specs

The skeleton is familiar-40 layers, 64 experts, top-4 routing, just like the LFM2-24B-A2B predecessor-but they stretched the context window from 32K to 131K tokens and doubled the vocabulary to 128K for way better non-Latin support. Pre-training data ballooned from roughly 17 trillion to 33 trillion tokens. A mid-training phase tossed in 2 trillion tokens at 32K context, heavily weighted toward reasoning, math, code, instruction following, and multilingual data, plus 300 billion tokens at the full 131K length for long-sequence chops. Tool calls and multi-turn trajectories were baked in throughout both phases. Post-training ran five laps: supervised fine-tuning, teacher specialization, two rounds of multi-domain on-policy distillation covering non-agentic and agentic tasks, and a final agentic RL pass inside harnesses like OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Pi, and OpenCode.

LFM2.5-24B-A2B benchmark results

Benchmarks against Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, and Nemotron-3.5-Lightning show this thing leading or matching bigger rivals on five of eight tool-use and agentic tests. On AutomationBench it hit 27.69-more than triple the next best score of 8.72. It also topped BFCLv4 at 65.01, ToolSandbox at 80.71, LiveClaw at 48.09, and τ³-Bench Banking at 8.04. Instruction-following suites IFEval, IFBench, and Multi-IF all leaned its way. Bigger models still win on knowledge-heavy stuff like GPQA Diamond and HLE, plus coding benchmarks such as SWE-Bench Verified and SciCode, so the LiquidAI crew suggests pairing this with retrieval or web search for those workloads.

Speed is the real pitch. On an Apple M5 Max it decodes at 184 tokens per second; on a Ryzen AI Max+ 395 it manages 114-both faster than the compared MoEs while sipping the least memory. On a single NVIDIA B300 GPU it can push past 21,000 output tokens per second at high concurrency. Day-one support covers llama.cpp, MLX, vLLM, SGLang, and ONNX, so you can drop it into existing pipelines without waiting for the ecosystem to catch up.

LFM2.5-24B-A2B installation requirements

Getting started needs transformers 5.0.0 or newer. The model ID is LiquidAI/LFM2.5-24B-A2B, and the recommended generation config uses a low 0.1 temperature with top-k 50 and a modest repetition penalty. For agent deployments, serve it locally behind any OpenAI-compatible backend-llama.cpp and MLX default to port 8080, vLLM to 8000, SGLang to 30000, LM Studio to 1234-then point harnesses like Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, or Pi at the base URL and model name in their config. The model card has example configs and the release blog links to video demos.

If you’re building private, on-device agents, treat this as a strong candidate for the reasoning layer, especially when tool use and instruction following matter more than raw knowledge retrieval. The combo of a 131K context window, explicit chain-of-thought output, and sub-2B active parameter count makes continuous agent loops on laptops and workstations genuinely feasible-no cloud required. Teams already on OpenAI-compatible serving stacks can swap it in with minimal plumbing, and the benchmark profile suggests it’ll outrun larger MoEs on the agentic tasks that usually bottleneck real-world workflows.

Frequently asked questions

What is the active parameter count of LFM2.5-24B-A2B during inference?

LFM2.5-24B-A2B activates only 2 billion parameters per token despite having 24 billion total parameters, thanks to its mixture-of-experts architecture with 64 experts and top-4 routing.

When was LFM2.5-24B-A2B released and where can I find it?

The model was released on Hugging Face on October 13, 2026, under the model ID LiquidAI/LFM2.5-24B-A2B with benchmarks and integration guides included.

How does LFM2.5-24B-A2B perform on agentic benchmarks compared to larger models?

It leads or matches larger rivals on five of eight tool-use and agentic tests, scoring 27.69 on AutomationBench (triple the next best), 65.01 on BFCLv4, 80.71 on ToolSandbox, 48.09 on LiveClaw, and 8.04 on τ³-Bench Banking.

What hardware and software are needed to run LFM2.5-24B-A2B locally?

It runs on consumer CPUs and GPUs with day-one support for llama.cpp, MLX, vLLM, SGLang, and ONNX. Requires transformers 5.0.0+. On Apple M5 Max it decodes at 184 tokens/second; on Ryzen AI Max+ 395 at 114 tokens/second.

Use temperature 0.1, top-k 50, and a modest repetition penalty. Serve via OpenAI-compatible backends: llama.cpp/MLX default to port 8080, vLLM to 8000, SGLang to 30000, LM Studio to 1234.

Source: Hugging Face

Google DeepMind Builds On-Device Scam Detection With Singapore
models

Google DeepMind Builds On-Device Scam Detection With Singapore

Google DeepMind partnered with Singapore's GovTech to deploy an on-device AI model that detects scams on users' phones. The Gemma model analyzes patterns without uploading data to the cloud, preserving privacy. Scams now exceed half of all reported crimes in Singapore, causing S$4 billion in losses since 2019. A two-stage pipeline minimizes battery drain. The system will roll out opt-in through government-backed apps, serving as a template for privacy-preserving safety tooling.

Shopify Lets Any AI Agent Shop Its Billion-Item Catalog
industry

Shopify Lets Any AI Agent Shop Its Billion-Item Catalog

Shopify now allows any AI agent to access its catalog of over one billion products through its Shop consumer app, eliminating the need for formal integration deals. Users connect an agent to their Shop account, enabling it to browse listings and complete purchases via Shopify’s one-click Shop Pay system, though every transaction still requires explicit buyer approval before the order is placed.

Static Site Generator vs CMS: What's the Real Difference?
tools

Static Site Generator vs CMS: What's the Real Difference?

A static site generator pre-builds every page into fixed HTML files served instantly from a CDN with no database or runtime, while a traditional CMS assembles pages on demand by querying a database and running application code per visitor. This split shapes editing (file-based builds vs. browser-based instant publishing), hosting (simple static files vs. managed servers and databases), and collaboration (developer-centric vs. non-technical independence). Hybrid tools now blend CMS edit

NO COMMENTS YET

Be the first · to weigh in

Comments are open. Have a thought or a question? Share it below.

Share this post